When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
When technology advances, traditional skills and lifestyles become not necessary. Some people argue that keeping these traditions is useless because they no longer play an important role in daily life. However, I disagree with this view.
Some may argue that old skills are no longer needed if technology develops. For example, we can now communicate with others via smartphones or store information on laptops, so old skills such as handwriting skills have become less important. Similarly, farming by hand or sewing clothes manually is not efficient because modern machines can do the same work much faster. From this point of view, keeping these traditional skills seems unnecessary.
On the other hand, I believe that traditional skills and ways of life are still relevant in today's society, both culturally and practically. Traditional skills and ways of life represent the nation’s identity. Traditions such as music or handcrafts help people stay connected to the past and allow future generations to learn about them. Otherwise, society may lose its uniqueness in a globalised world. From a practical standpoint, traditional methods are still useful today. For instance, organic farming are more eco-friendly than modern farming and also supports healthier diets. Another example is that handmade products are often durable than mass-produced goods. These examples show that old skills can still relevant in today's society.
In conclusion, while some people argue that traditional skills are no longer needed, I believe that they are still necessary. They protect cultural identity and also provide practical benefits.
Task Response(TR)