トップページ 最新記事 記事一覧 無料IELTS学習相談 お問合せ 不具合報告

Band Descriptors
ライティングTask 1採点基準

IELTSライティングTask 1では、以下の採点基準(Band Descriptors)にしたがって、Task Achievement、Coherence and Cohesion、Lexical Resource、Grammatical Range and Accuracyの4項目で評価されます。それぞれ、Band 9からBand 0までの整数値でスコアリングされ、最終的なライティングのスコアは、平均値に最も近い0.5単位に切り下げられます。

例えば、Task Achievement: 6、Coherence and Cohesion: 6、Lexical Resource: 7、Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6の場合、平均値は6.25で、最も近い0.5単位に切り下げられるため、最終的なライティングのスコアは6.0となります。

Band Task Achievement Coherence and Cohesion Lexical Resource Grammatical Range and Accuracy
9
  • - fully satisfies all the requirements of the task
  • - clearly presents a fully developed response
  • - uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention
  • - skilfully manages paragraphing
  • - uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features; rare minor errors occur only as 'slips'
  • - uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors occur only as 'slips'
8
  • - covers all requirements of the task sufficiently
  • - presents, highlights and illustrates key features/bullet points clearly and appropriately
  • - sequences information and ideas logically
  • - manages all aspects of cohesion well
  • - uses paragraphing sufficiently and appropriately
  • - uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings
  • - skilfully uses uncommon lexical items but there may be occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation
  • - produces rare errors in spelling and/or word formation
  • - uses a wide range of structures
  • - the majority of sentences are error-free
  • - makes only very occasional errors or inappropriacies
7
  • - covers the requirements of the task
  • - (Academic) presents a clear overview of main trends, differences or stages
  • - (General Training) presents a clear purpose, with the tone consistent and appropriate
  • - clearly presents and highlights key features/bullet points but could be more fully extended
  • - logically organises information and ideas; there is clear progression throughout
  • - uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately although there may be some under-/over-use
  • - uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision
  • - uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation
  • - may produce occasional errors in word choice, spelling and/or word formation
  • - uses a variety of complex structures
  • - produces frequent error-free sentences
  • - has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make a few errors
6
  • - addresses the requirements of the task
  • - (Academic) presents an overview with information appropriately selected
  • - (General Training) presents a purpose that is generally clear; there may be inconsistencies in tone
  • - presents and adequately highlights key features/bullet points but details may be irrelevant, inappropriate or inaccurate
  • - arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression
  • - uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical
  • - may not always use referencing clearly or appropriately
  • - uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task
  • - attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy
  • - makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation, but they do not impede communication
  • - uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms
  • - makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication
5
  • - generally addresses the task; the format may be inappropriate in places
  • - (Academic) recounts details mechanically with no clear overview; there may be no data to support the description
  • - (General Training) may present a purpose for the letter that is unclear at times; the tone may be variable and sometimes inappropriate
  • - presents, but inadequately covers, key features/bullet points; there may be a tendency to focus on details
  • - presents information with some organisation but there may be a lack of overall progression
  • - makes inadequate, inaccurate or over-use of cohesive devices
  • - may be repetitive because of lack of referencing and substitution
  • - uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task
  • - may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader
  • - uses only a limited range of structures
  • - attempts complex sentences but these tend to be less accurate than simple sentences
  • - may make frequent grammatical errors and punctuation may be faulty; errors can cause some difficulty for the reader
4
  • - attempts to address the task but does not cover all key features/bullet points; the format may be inappropriate
  • - (General Training) fails to clearly explain the purpose of the letter; the tone may be inappropriate
  • - may confuse key features/bullet points with detail; parts may be unclear, irrelevant, repetitive or inaccurate
  • - presents information and ideas but these are not arranged coherently and there is no clear progression in the response
  • - uses some basic cohesive devices but these may be inaccurate or repetitive
  • - uses only basic vocabulary which may be used repetitively or which may be inappropriate for the task
  • - has limited control of word formation and/or spelling; errors may cause strain for the reader
  • - uses only a very limited range of structures with only rare use of subordinate clauses
  • - some structures are accurate but errors predominate, and punctuation is often faulty
3
  • - fails to address the task, which may have been completely misunderstood
  • - presents limited ideas which may be largely irrelevant/repetitive
  • - does not organise ideas logically
  • - may use a very limited range of cohesive devices, and those used may not indicate a logical relationship between ideas
  • - uses only a very limited range of words and expressions with very limited control of word formation and/or spelling
  • - errors may severely distort the message
  • - attempts sentence forms but errors in grammar and punctuation predominate and distort the meaning
2
  • - barely responds to the task
  • - does not express a position
  • - may attempt to present one or two ideas but there is no development
  • - has very little control of organisational features
  • - uses an extremely limited range of vocabulary; essentially no control of word formation and/or spelling
  • - cannot use sentence forms except in memorised phrases
1
  • - answer is completely unrelated to the task
  • - fails to communicate any message
  • - can only use a few isolated words
  • - cannot use sentence forms at all
0
  • - does not attend
  • - does not attempt the task in any way
  • - writes a totally memorised response
Ask the Expert

プラスワンポイントでは、IELTS学習に関する疑問やお悩みを相談できる『無料IELTS学習相談』を実施しています。IELTSの学習方法やスコアアップのコツ、勉強計画の立て方などを、経験豊富なカウンセラーが無料でアドバイスいたします。お気軽にご相談ください。

Hibiki

この記事を書いた人

Hibiki Takahashi

日本語で学ぶIELTS対策専門スクール 『PlusOnePoint(プラスワンポイント)』創設者・代表。『英語ライティングの鬼100則』(明日香出版社)著者。1997年に大阪大学医学部を卒業後、麻酔科専門医として活躍。2012年渡豪時に自身が苦労をした経験から、日本人を対象に IELTS対策のサービスを複数展開。難しい文法・語彙を駆使するのではなく、シンプルな表現とアイデアで論理性・明瞭性のあるライティングを指導している。これまでの利用者は4,000名を超え、Twitterで実施した「12週間チャレンジ」では、わずか4週間で7.0、7週間で7.5など、参加者4名全員が短期間でライティングスコア7.0以上を達成(うち2名は7.5を達成)。「IELTSライティングの鬼」の異名を持つ。オーストラリア在住13年、IELTS 8.5(ライティング 8.0)、CEFR C2。