トップページ 最新記事 記事一覧 無料IELTS学習相談 お問合せ 不具合報告

Band Descriptors
ライティングTask 2採点基準

IELTSライティングTask 2では、以下の採点基準(Band Descriptors)にしたがって、Task Response、Coherence and Cohesion、Lexical Resource、Grammatical Range and Accuracyの4項目で評価されます。それぞれ、Band 9からBand 0までの整数値でスコアリングされ、最終的なライティングのスコアは、平均値に最も近い0.5単位に切り下げられます。

例えば、Task Response: 6、Coherence and Cohesion: 6、Lexical Resource: 7、Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6の場合、平均値は6.25で、最も近い0.5単位に切り下げられるため、最終的なライティングのスコアは6.0となります。

Band Task Response Coherence and Cohesion Lexical Resource Grammatical Range and Accuracy
9
  • - fully addresses all parts of the task
  • - presents a fully developed position in answer to the question with relevant, fully extended and well supported ideas
  • - uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention
  • - skilfully manages paragraphing
  • - uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features; rare minor errors occur only as 'slips'
  • - uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors occur only as 'slips'
8
  • - sufficiently addresses all parts of the task
  • - presents a well-developed response to the question with relevant, extended and supported ideas
  • - sequences information and ideas logically
  • - manages all aspects of cohesion well
  • - uses paragraphing sufficiently and appropriately
  • - uses a wide range of vocabulary fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings
  • - skilfully uses uncommon lexical items but there may be occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation
  • - produces rare errors in spelling and/or word formation
  • - uses a wide range of structures
  • - the majority of sentences are error-free
  • - makes only very occasional errors or inappropriacies
7
  • - addresses all parts of the task
  • - presents a clear position throughout the response
  • - presents, extends and supports main ideas, but there may be a tendency to over-generalise and/or supporting ideas may lack focus
  • - logically organises information and ideas; there is clear progression throughout
  • - uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately although there may be some under-/over-use
  • - presents a clear central topic within each paragraph
  • - uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision
  • - uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation
  • - may produce occasional errors in word choice, spelling and/or word formation
  • - uses a variety of complex structures
  • - produces frequent error-free sentences
  • - has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make a few errors
6
  • - addresses all parts of the task although some parts may be more fully covered than others
  • - presents a relevant position although the conclusions may become unclear or repetitive
  • - presents relevant main ideas but some may be inadequately developed/unclear
  • - arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression
  • - uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical
  • - may not always use referencing clearly or appropriately
  • - uses paragraphing, but not always logically
  • - uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task
  • - attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy
  • - makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation, but they do not impede communication
  • - uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms
  • - makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication
5
  • - addresses the task only partially; the format may be inappropriate in places
  • - expresses a position but the development is not always clear and there may be no conclusions drawn
  • - presents some main ideas but these are limited and not sufficiently developed; there may be irrelevant detail
  • - presents information with some organisation but there may be a lack of overall progression
  • - makes inadequate, inaccurate or over-use of cohesive devices
  • - may be repetitive because of lack of referencing and substitution
  • - may not write in paragraphs, or paragraphing may be inadequate
  • - uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task
  • - may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader
  • - uses only a limited range of structures
  • - attempts complex sentences but these tend to be less accurate than simple sentences
  • - may make frequent grammatical errors and punctuation may be faulty; errors can cause some difficulty for the reader
4
  • - responds to the task only in a minimal way or the answer is tangential; the format may be inappropriate
  • - presents a position but this is unclear
  • - presents some main ideas but these are difficult to identify and may be repetitive, irrelevant or not well developed
  • - presents information and ideas but these are not arranged coherently and there is no clear progression in the response
  • - uses some basic cohesive devices but these may be inaccurate or repetitive
  • - may not write in paragraphs or their use may be confusing
  • - uses only basic vocabulary which may be used repetitively or which may be inappropriate for the task
  • - has limited control of word formation and/or spelling; errors may cause strain for the reader
  • - uses only a very limited range of structures with only rare use of subordinate clauses
  • - some structures are accurate but errors predominate, and punctuation is often faulty
3
  • - does not adequately address any part of the task
  • - does not express a clear position
  • - presents few ideas, which are largely undeveloped or irrelevant
  • - does not organise ideas logically
  • - may use a very limited range of cohesive devices, and those used may not indicate a logical relationship between ideas
  • - uses only a very limited range of words and expressions with very limited control of word formation and/or spelling
  • - errors may severely distort the message
  • - attempts sentence forms but errors in grammar and punctuation predominate and distort the meaning
2
  • - barely responds to the task
  • - does not express a position
  • - may attempt to present one or two ideas but there is no development
  • - has very little control of organisational features
  • - uses an extremely limited range of vocabulary; essentially no control of word formation and/or spelling
  • - cannot use sentence forms except in memorised phrases
1
  • - answer is completely unrelated to the task
  • - fails to communicate any message
  • - can only use a few isolated words
  • - cannot use sentence forms at all
0
  • - does not attend
  • - does not attempt the task in any way
  • - writes a totally memorised response
Ask the Expert

プラスワンポイントでは、IELTS学習に関する疑問やお悩みを相談できる『無料IELTS学習相談』を実施しています。IELTSの学習方法やスコアアップのコツ、勉強計画の立て方などを、経験豊富なカウンセラーが無料でアドバイスいたします。お気軽にご相談ください。

Hibiki

この記事を書いた人

Hibiki Takahashi

日本語で学ぶIELTS対策専門スクール 『PlusOnePoint(プラスワンポイント)』創設者・代表。『英語ライティングの鬼100則』(明日香出版社)著者。1997年に大阪大学医学部を卒業後、麻酔科専門医として活躍。2012年渡豪時に自身が苦労をした経験から、日本人を対象に IELTS対策のサービスを複数展開。難しい文法・語彙を駆使するのではなく、シンプルな表現とアイデアで論理性・明瞭性のあるライティングを指導している。これまでの利用者は4,000名を超え、Twitterで実施した「12週間チャレンジ」では、わずか4週間で7.0、7週間で7.5など、参加者4名全員が短期間でライティングスコア7.0以上を達成(うち2名は7.5を達成)。「IELTSライティングの鬼」の異名を持つ。オーストラリア在住13年、IELTS 8.5(ライティング 8.0)、CEFR C2。